Archive for the ‘Blog’ Category

Singing the Praises of Fat

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

(CBS News)

We all know the downside of eating too many calories and too much fat … or do we? What if we were to tell you that many nutritionists now believe that fat isn’t so bad for you after all? Would you offer up a prayer of Thanksgiving, or simply say FAT CHANCE? Please withhold your judgment until you’ve seen Rita Braver’s Cover Story:

In a kitchen in Toronto, the fat is on the fire … sizzling, baking, bubbling …

“I’m happy to be the ‘fat lady,’” That’s what I call myself, and it always gets a laugh,” said chef Jennifer McLagen. “But I wanna point out that by eating fat you’re not going to get fat. I’m an example of that!”

McLagan says people eat less of fatty foods because they’re more filling, and she calls fat the “misunderstood” ingredient.

“We all think of phrases like a ‘tub of lard,’” said Braver, “that sounds sort of big and bulky and disgusting.”

“Lard [is] really a four-letter word,” McLagen laughed. “You know, it doesn’t sound that good. But it’s a shame because it’s a fabulous fat.”

McLagan, author of the James Beard Award-winning cookbook called – you guessed it – “Fat,” argues that eating a moderate amount of animal fat can be healthy and delicious, persuading even a skeptical reporter to try a taste of rosemary-infused lard.

“It has a lovely, like, a delicate flavor,” said Braver. “it’s a surprise, I admit.”

Also surprising is that fat can be rich in vitamins and omega-3′s.

Click here for fat-friendly recipes from chefs Jennifer McLagen and Chris Cosentino, and other delicious dishes from this year’s “Food Issue” !

“We’ve been eating animal fats for 10,000 years, right? It’s been part of our diet up until this crazy thing where all of a sudden we decided fat was bad for us,” said McLagen. “And if fat HAD been that bad for us, we’d all be a lot healthier today, because we’ve seem to have given it up – and we don’t seem to be any healthier or happier.”

It does seem that we’ve been in a fight over fat for years. Foods containing saturated fat, like milk, eggs and bacon, were once considered the hallmark of a healthy breakfast.

But in the late 1970s, a Senate committee on nutrition, led by former presidential candidate George McGovern, warned against eating animal fats.

(Credit: CBS)

Even then, scientists, including Dr. Robert Olson of St. Louis University, challenged the findings: “This is not, senators, a question of the last iota of proof. This is a question of any proof.”

Still, the Senate report ushered in an era of low-fat products, like low-fat yogurt.

But not everyone jumped on the low-fat bandwagon:

Gary Taubes has been studying and writing about our fat phobia for more than a decade.

“I mean, it’s just completely ill-conceived, this low-fat diet, this low-saturated fat diet,” said Taubes. “You know, the idea that we should not eat butter, that we should eat low-fat yogurt instead of full-fat yogurt.”

Taubes scoffs at idea that eating animal fat is unhealthy:

“You’re just going against the science,” he said. “The studies have never been able to prove it. And you’ve got clinical trials that demonstrate the opposite, that demonstrate that a high animal fat [diet] is a healthy diet.”

Indeed, according to a 2010 study published in Annals of Medicine, higher-fat, lower-carbohydrate diets worked better to reduce cholesterol than lower-fat, higher-carbohydrate diets.

But before you reach for another piece of bacon, here’s the tricky part:

Cardiologist Gordon Tomaselli, president of the American Heart Association, cites other data indicating that eating animal fat can be unhealthy.

“From our perspective, excessive consumption of saturated fat is a bad habit to be in,” Tomaselli said. “The epidemiologic evidence tell us, other studies tell us that saturated fats, when consumed, will increase levels of cholesterol.”

In fact, the Heart Association website calls saturated fat a “bad” fat, and suggests limiting it to 7% of your calories.

“If you’ve been staying away from the skin on your chicken, that’s probably a good thing, and you should continue to do it,” he said.

But it seems there’s no stopping the urge to chew the fat.

At the San Francisco restaurant Incanto, chef Chris Cosentino says that cooking with fat is a family tradition.

“My grandmother lived to 98, he laughed. “My great-grandmother lived to be 99. Obviously they did something right.”

And, Braver admits, the egg he offered that was cooked in olive oil didn’t compare to the one cooked in chicken fat. (“That tastes pretty good!” she said. “A huge difference in flavor.”)

“Massive difference,” said Cosentino.

“I know, ’cause I want to eat that entire egg!” she laughed.

“I mean, if you consume gallons of animal fat each day, of course you’re going to get ill,” said Cosentino. “Excess in anything is bad for you. But a good balance of animal fat with protein is actually good for you.”

So until the fat fight ends, maybe the key to healthy, happy fatty eating is moderation.

 

 

Just Say NO to SOY! Prosperity Proudly Announces Organic Melt® is Now SOY FREE!

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

As I have mentioned in previous posts, I am thrilled we are finishing the transition to soy-free Melt® that is also now in a larger size for the same price. It even tastes better than before – what a WIN-WIN for everyone. It seems the deeper I look into soy food products, the worse the news gets. If soy-free Melt® is not yet available in your area, you can also order it online from our website for the same price you would pay at the store: www.meltbutteryspread.com.  

What’s the big deal about soy? Read on and find out. Below is a summary of the risks associated with eating soy, myths and truth about soy, and an account written by Ayurvedic Dr. Marianne Titlebaum, D.C. and her experience working with patients that consume soy on a regular basis. It is a pretty shocking when you consider how effectively soy products have been marketed as “health food”. People! Soy is anything but healthy! An additional resource to consider is a book titled, “The Whole Soy Story” by Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN.

Confused About Soy?–Soy Dangers Summarized

Written by the Weston A. Price Foundation

  • High levels of phytic acid in soy reduce assimilation of calcium, magnesium, copper, iron and zinc. Phytic acid in soy is not neutralized by ordinary preparation methods such as soaking, sprouting and long, slow cooking. High phytate diets have caused growth problems in children.
  • Trypsin inhibitors in soy interfere with protein digestion and may cause pancreatic disorders. In test animals soy containing trypsin inhibitors caused stunted growth.
  • Soy phytoestrogens disrupt endocrine function and have the potential to cause infertility and to promote breast cancer in adult women.
  • Soy phytoestrogens are potent antithyroid agents that cause hypothyroidism and may cause thyroid cancer. In infants, consumption of soy formula has been linked to autoimmune thyroid disease.
  • Vitamin B12 analogs in soy are not absorbed and actually increase the body's requirement for B12.
  • Soy foods increase the body's requirement for vitamin D.
  • Fragile proteins are denatured during high temperature processing to make soy protein isolate and textured vegetable protein.
  • Processing of soy protein results in the formation of toxic lysinoalanine and highly carcinogenic nitrosamines.
  • Free glutamic acid or MSG, a potent neurotoxin, is formed during soy food processing and additional amounts are added to many soy foods.
  • Soy foods contain high levels of aluminum which is toxic to the nervous system and the kidneys.

The Myths and Truths About Soy 

Written by the Weston A. Price Foundation

December 31, 1999

Myth: Use of soy as a food dates back many thousands of years.

Truth: Soy was first used as a food during the late Chou dynasty (1134-246 BC), only after the Chinese learned to ferment soy beans to make foods like tempeh, natto and tamari.

Myth: Asians consume large amounts of soy foods.

Truth: Average consumption of soy foods in Japan and China is 10 grams (about 2 teaspoons) per day. Asians consume soy foods in small amounts as a condiment, and not as a replacement for animal foods.

Myth: Modern soy foods confer the same health benefits as traditionally fermented soy foods.

Truth: Most modern soy foods are not fermented to neutralize toxins in soybeans, and are processed in a way that denatures proteins and increases levels of carcinogens.

Myth: Soy foods provide complete protein.

Truth: Like all legumes, soy beans are deficient in sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cystine. In addition, modern processing denatures fragile lysine.

Myth: Fermented soy foods can provide vitamin B12 in vegetarian diets.

Truth: The compound that resembles vitamin B12 in soy cannot be used by the human body; in fact, soy foods cause the body to require more B12

Myth: Soy formula is safe for infants.

Truth: Soy foods contain trypsin inhibitors that inhibit protein digestion and affect pancreatic function. In test animals, diets high in trypsin inhibitors led to stunted growth and pancreatic disorders. Soy foods increase the body's requirement for vitamin D, needed for strong bones and normal growth. Phytic acid in soy foods results in reduced bioavailabilty of iron and zinc which are required for the health and development of the brain and nervous system. Soy also lacks cholesterol, likewise essential for the development of the brain and nervous system. Megadoses of phytoestrogens in soy formula have been implicated in the current trend toward increasingly premature sexual development in girls and delayed or retarded sexual development in boys.

Myth: Soy foods can prevent osteoporosis.

Truth: Soy foods can cause deficiencies in calcium and vitamin D, both needed for healthy bones. Calcium from bone broths and vitamin D from seafood, lard and organ meats prevent osteoporosis in Asian countries—not soy foods.

Myth: Modern soy foods protect against many types of cancer.

Truth: A British government report concluded that there is little evidence that soy foods protect against breast cancer or any other forms of cancer. In fact, soy foods may result in an increased risk of cancer.

Myth: Soy foods protect against heart disease.

Truth: In some people, consumption of soy foods will lower cholesterol, but there is no evidence that lowering cholesterol with soy protein improves one's risk of having heart disease.

Myth: Soy estrogens (isoflavones) are good for you.

Truth: Soy isoflavones are phyto-endocrine disrupters. At dietary levels, they can prevent ovulation and stimulate the growth of cancer cells. Eating as little as 30 grams (about 4 tablespoons) of soy per day can result in hypothyroidism with symptoms of lethargy, constipation, weight gain and fatigue.

Myth: Soy foods are safe and beneficial for women to use in their postmenopausal years.

Truth: Soy foods can stimulate the growth of estrogen-dependent tumors and cause thyroid problems. Low thyroid function is associated with difficulties in menopause.

Myth: Phytoestrogens in soy foods can enhance mental ability.

Truth: A recent study found that women with the highest levels of estrogen in their blood had the lowest levels of cognitive function; In Japanese Americans tofu consumption in mid-life is associated with the occurrence of Alzheimer's disease in later life.

Myth: Soy isoflavones and soy protein isolate have GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status.

Truth: Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) recently withdrew its application to the FDA for GRAS status for soy isoflavones following an outpouring of protest from the scientific community. The FDA never approved GRAS status for soy protein isolate because of concern regarding the presence of toxins and carcinogens in processed soy.

Myth: Soy foods are good for your sex life.

Truth: Numerous animal studies show that soy foods cause infertility in animals. Soy consumption enhances hair growth in middle-aged men, indicating lowered testosterone levels. Japanese housewives feed tofu to their husbands frequently when they want to reduce his virility.

Myth: Soy beans are good for the environment.

Truth: Most soy beans grown in the US are genetically engineered to allow farmers to use large amounts of herbicides.

Myth: Soy beans are good for developing nations.

Truth: In third world countries, soybeans replace traditional crops and transfer the value-added of processing from the local population to multinational corporations.

The Case Against SOY. Just Say No… 

Written by Ayurvedic Dr. Marianne Titlebaum, D.C.

“Thanks for distributing information about soy. It is important to get the word out to people, because soy is sold in all the health food stores now, which makes people think it's a healthy alternative to cow's milk. In addition to these studies, clinically, by feeling the pulse we can add to this growing list against soy:

– The soybean cannot be digested properly, thus does not go from the "channel" into the cells, where the body can make energy, etc. from it. Thus, it remains stuck in the channels. Whenever I have a patient who has eaten a lot of soy, I have to spend the next several months trying to scrub the channels and get them to open again so whatever is flowing through these channels can get through: toxins, hormones, food, blood, etc. Normally, when a patient has clogged channels, it takes me about a month to open them back up. It takes much, much longer if they have had a steady diet of soy.

– Soy has isoflavones in it, which depress the thyroid gland. I have a saying in my practice which is that I save "one thyroid gland a week from soy". Actually, it turns out to be more than one thyroid gland a week! But at any rate, we see an awful lot of women eating soy and it is depressing their thyroid gland tremendously. I can't tell you how many patients have come in with irregular heartbeats. Some were even on pharmaceuticals for it, which were not helping at all. After feeling their pulse, seeing the clogging of the channels and the depression of the thyroid, I asked them to just stop eating soy for one week, come in again and see if the heart could beat regularly again. It's actually a miracle cure for irregular heartbeats! When they stop the soy, the thyroid comes back up and like magic the heart is able to regain its normal rhythm.

– When you see several hundred people a month like I do, you start to see several patterns emerging. Specifically regarding soy, when a patient has been eating it for a while, they start forming "growths" — cysts, tumors — which could show up anywhere on the body. The reason: soy has "unintelligent" estrogen in it. What does estrogen do? It makes things grow — like breasts, hips — and when it is the unintelligent version, as Dr. Mishra likes to call it, it starts to make these growths.

– At one of the National Ayurvedic Medical Association meetings (in 2006), in New York City, someone presented an hour-long-talk about all the negative research on soy. I knew already most of the things he said. However, one thing still sticks in my mind that is quite disturbing. He said that when a baby is given a soy formula, when you factor in the size of the baby along with the estrogenic effects of soy, it is the equivalent of exposing the baby to 5 birth control pills a day. That is such a tragedy. So many babies are on soy formulas.

– A common multivitamin formula is being advertised all over the media as being good for the bones, because they have added soy isoflavones to the formula (Centrum, I believe). This is going to be bad news for a lot of people who will take this remedy thinking it is good for their bones.
Hope all is well with you. I love to share this information. Holistic medicine is in its infancy here in the Western world. It is hard watching the medical profession treat symptoms while making a person sicker with the pharmaceuticals. It is just as hard watching people trying to regain their health with the limited knowledge we have about diet and nutrition here in the West.

In fact, if any people on your list would like me to share with them information about cow's milk, I would be more than happy to engage in a back and forth with them and answer any questions they may have regarding the use of whole milk.

I write and lecture frequently here on the East Coast about diet and nutrition and people usually get everything I say, but everything goes downhill when I start my discussion on the use of cow's milk. We have very large macrobiotic, vegan and raw foods enthusiasts in our country, and asking people to put milk back into their diet, instead of soymilk, is the most difficult thing I do.
Milk is definitely the most misunderstood food. I'll wait to hear from you and see if there is any interest in this subject. I'll be surprised if you don't get any responses!!”

Take care, and blessings to you,

Marianne Teitelbaum, D.C.

teitelbaum@comcast.net

 

ACTION ALERT: Is the 1%’s Super Committee Writing a Secret Farm Bill?

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

Demand Cuts to Corporate Welfare – Not Hunger and Sustainable Ag Programs!

The Big Ag lobby suffered a shock when an amendment offered by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to cut farm subsidies to anyone with an average income of over $1 million cleared the Senate by a vote of 84-15. This proposal has yet to become law, but it is clear that the momentum is not in Big Ag's favor. Congress is ready to vote for a fairer Farm Bill in 2012 when the current law expires. Knowing that, corporate lobbyists working for the 1% are trying to prevent any more votes like that one.

Big Ag's current strategy is for Congress not to vote on a new Farm Bill at all. They'd rather have the Super Committee, set to cut at least $1.2 trillion from the federal debt in November, shape the bill behind closed doors. Their idea is for the Super Committee to cut $23 billion over 10 years, mostly from conservation and nutrition programs that help the hungry, family farmers, and sustainable agriculture, rather than save more money by adopting the White House proposal to save $50 billion over 10 years by ending all direct payments that go to mega farms growing crops for polluting factory farms and unhealthy junk food.

Ag Committee Chairmen and Super Committee members are currently working on a Secret Farm Bill that by all accounts will favor Big Ag over family-scale organic farmers and the swelling ranks of those who are relying on Food Stamps and school lunch programs to survive during the continuing economic crisis.

Tell Congress: Cut Corporate Welfare – Not Hunger and Sustainable Ag Programs!

Excerpt taken from the Organic Consumers Association newsletter. To take action, click here: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_24260.cfm to enter your zip code for contacting your local congressmen.

Grass-fed, Organic Sources of Saturated Fat Should Not Be Taxed

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

The Danish government apparently believes they can and should decide which foods are healthy and levy taxes on foods they deem unhealthy. While most of the world is realizing science does not back up the claim that high quality, organic, grass-fed sources of saturated fats are unhealthy (e.g., Siri-Torino et al, 2010), Denmark is moving in the opposite direction and proposing legislation to discourage people from eating saturated fats. Perhaps someone should remind Lars Løkke Rasmussen that human breast milk has one of the highest concentrations of saturated fat (including lauric acid found in virgin coconut oil) and is essential to human health and infant development. Is the Danish government proposing that nursing mothers should discontinue breast feeding?

An excellent resource for understanding healthy fats is Dr Mary Enig's book, Know Your Fats: The Complete Primer for Understanding the Nutrition of Fats, Oils, and Cholesterol (2001). 

Below is an interesting rebuttal written by Stanley A Fishman, author of Tender Grassfed Meats. Organic, unrefined, plant-based sources of saturated fat, like virgin coconut oil, are critical to health for all of the same reasons provided below for grass-fed sources of animal fat. Furthermore, high-quality, organic, plant-based sources of saturated fats, like virgin coconut oil, are more readily available in the American marketplace over raw milk, raw butter, and animal food products from grass-fed animals.

“Denmark is a nation that is famous for its high-quality butter, cheese, and pork, which all contain large amounts of health-giving saturated animal fat. Now Denmark has decided to place a heavy tax on all foods containing saturated animal fats. The tax is scaled to the amount of saturated animal fat in the food, so lard would have a 35% tax on its consumption.

Saturated animal fat from healthy animals is a key part of the traditional Danish diet, but that was ignored.

Most of the Danish people oppose this tax, but that did not seem to matter to the Danish legislators, ninety percent of whom voted for the tax.

The legislators claim that taxing foods based on the amount of saturated fat they contain will force people to eat “healthier” foods, increase lifespan, and avoid disease. None of these things are true.

The basic human right of the Danish people to choose their own food was ignored.

Now, Finland, Britain, and Romania are all considering imposing a tax on saturated fat consumption. The goal is to force everybody to eat a “plant-based” diet.

Aside from the fact that no government has the right to control what we eat, this is a very bad policy. Saturated animal fat has been demonized, but is actually a vital nutrient needed by human beings. Since crucial vitamins such as Vitamin A, Vitamin D, Vitamin E, and Vitamin K are fat-soluble, our bodies need this fat to properly absorb the vitamins. Saturated animal fats contain substances that keep the mind sharp and functioning, and help the immune system. Saturated animal fats provide many other nutrients that our bodies need and expect, and modern vegetable oils just do not contain these nutrients. A detailed article explaining the truth about fats is The Skinny on Fats.

For most of human existence, humans ate a Paleo-style diet that was animal based, getting most of their nutrients from wild animals, fish, and shellfish, though many roots, fruits, nuts, and vegetables were also eaten. The whole animal was eaten, including all the organ meats, and the bones were chewed on and often made into broth. We and our bodies have evolved to thrive upon animal foods. All animal foods contain saturated animal fat, and that is what our bodies have evolved to use. By making it harder for us to afford the very food that our bodies need to stay healthy and thrive, the government will make people sicker and weaker.

The fossil record shows what moving to a plant-based diet can do. The skeletons of humans before the invention of agriculture showed tall, strong people with dense, healthy bones, often with no sign of disease. The skeletons of people after the spread of agriculture were often a foot shorter, with thin, fragile bones, and showed the mark of many diseases.

History shows that the ruling classes in agriculture-based societies often reserved meat and other animal foods for themselves, forcing the peasants to eat mainly grains and vegetables. Medieval Europe is a great example of this practice, where only nobles were allowed to hunt wild game, and most of the meat produced by agriculture was taken by the nobles, their soldiers, and the upper classes. The term “meat eater,” meant someone of importance. The meat- and fat-eating classes were taller, stronger, more intelligent, healthier, and lived much longer than the peasant classes, whose access to meat and fat were strictly limited. A common person who hunted wild game was considered a “poacher,” and would be hanged if caught.

The meat shortage in Europe persisted well into the nineteenth century, when the high cost of meat made it too expensive for most people. In contrast, meat was cheap and plentiful in early America, with plenty of wild game, no poaching laws, and many domestic animals who thrived in the new land. Many people immigrated to the United States because they heard that even poor people could afford meat there. Of course, the meat was high-quality wild game, wild fish, wild shellfish, and grassfed and pastured animals. The curse of factory meat had not yet been invented.

Writers at the time of the American Revolution noted that the Americans were much taller, stronger, and healthier than the poor classes in Europe. Americans, eating a diet full of animal fats and meat, were noted for their intelligence, inventiveness, and ability to innovate and get things done. “Yankee ingenuity” became a common phrase because of these qualities.

History shows us that eating animal foods, in the form of grassfed and pastured meat and fat, is very beneficial to human beings. It is the food that is most natural to us. Dairy-based fats such as butter, unprocessed milk and cheese, yogurt, kefir, and others, have also been shown to be very nutritious, especially when eaten in their traditional forms, and made from pastured dairy animals.

Bad laws such as the Danish fat tax are actually moving us back to the Middle Ages, making it harder for us to afford the foods we need to support the natural functions of our bodies, and pushing us towards a plant-based diet that may be fine for herbivores with four stomachs, but not for human beings.

This tax will benefit large industries, and nobody else.

The food industry will benefit because it makes much more money on plant-based refined foods, such as dry cereal, which are very cheap to produce.

The medical industry will benefit because more people will be sick because of inadequate nutrition, which will mean more profit from medical services and drugs.

If the call for a fat tax reaches your nation, it is important to fight it and preserve our rights to eat the foods our bodies need.”

 

Functional Foods are More Than Fruits and Vegetables!

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

Hi Everyone! The Phil Lempert Report recently aired an interesting story on the increasing awareness and rising demand for functional foods. Functional foods are defined as food and components of foods that are believed to improve overall health, reduce the risk of specific diseases, and minimize the effects of other health concerns. To summarize, Americans want functional foods in their diets and feel they make a meaningful impact on their lives, but feel stymied by expense, unappealing taste, and lack of widespread availability.  In addition, almost half of all Americans do not feel they have enough information to understand which foods provide added benefit. In other words, Americans do not have complete information on how to choose, balance, and incorporate functional foods in their diet and need more guidance. This is understandable considering the widespread influence large, multi-national corporations have on availability of food products and the dominance of industry-driven marketing. I have included the story below for reference.

It is interesting to note that fruits and vegetables ranked the highest in perceived “healthiness” (70%) even though a well rounded, healthy diet includes other functional foods besides fruits and vegetables. In particular, fish oil is the only dietary oil that is mentioned as a functional food by survey participants. Thanks to the ground breaking work of Dr. Mary Enig and other lipids chemists, we know virgin coconut oil has great potential as a functional food. Virgin coconut oil does not just enhance the absorption and utilization of the DHA and EPA omega 3s in the aforementioned fish oil, but also provides a rich source of lauric acid and medium chain fatty acids. I have personally benefitted from virgin coconut oil on my journey recovering from a collection of digestive disorders and cannot be a bigger proponent of virgin coconut oil as a functional food.

 

IFIC Functional Foods 2011 Survey (available at: http://www.foodnutritionscience.com/index.cfm/do/monsanto.article/articleId/559.cfm)

Americans want to take advantage of the health benefits of foods, according to the2011 Functional Foods/Foods for Health Consumer Trending Survey. The survey asked questions from a random sample of 1,000 U.S. adults about various attitudes toward health and consumer awareness of 34 different diet and health relationships.

The majority of those surveyed (73%) say that food and nutrition are responsible for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, with exercise (63%) following close behind. Eighty-seven percent of participants believe that certain foods have health benefits that go beyond basic nutrition. An overwhelming 90% of those surveyed can name a food and its associated benefit (compared to 77% in 1998).

The top ten functional foods named by participants in this study are fruits and vegetables (70%), fish and fish oil (18%), dairy (16%), herbs and spices (10%), whole grains (10%), fiber (7%), meat and poultry (7%), tea and green tea (5%), nuts (4%) and vitamins and supplements (2%). Fruits and veggies are overwhelmingly number one in terms of what consumers perceive as functional foods, but Elizabeth Rahavi, RD, Associate Director, Health and Wellness for International Food Information Council and Foundation, says we can broaden Americans' perspective about functional foods.

"When we communicate about health benefits, it's helpful to remember that the functional foods that aren't necessarily top of mind for consumers, like nuts, tea, fiber, whole grains and dairy, are also nutritious food choices. While important, it's not just fruits and vegetables. There are lots of healthful components in a variety of great tasting foods and beverages that can make a difference in our health," says Rahavi.

Functional foods are defined as food and components of foods that are believed to improve overall health, reduce the risk of specific diseases, and minimize the effects of other health concerns. The survey found that 87% (vs. 85% in 2009) are interested in learning more about foods with benefits, which makes sense when almost one in five Americans (19%) cite healthy aging as a top health concern, 46% cite cardiovascular disease, 32% cite weight and 22% cite cancer.

Consumers said calcium (92%) and vitamin D (90%) were the top benefits derived from functional foods for bone health; protein (87%) and B vitamins (86%) were mentioned as good for overall health; omega-3 fatty acids (85%) took the reigns for heart health; probiotics (81%) and fiber (79%) were identified as good for digestive health.

Still, even with all this knowledge out there – and the fact that consumer awareness of functional foods has significantly increased since 1998 – consumption levels of these key food components have generally not changed since 2005. The struggle to further incorporate functional foods, consumers say, has to do with expense, taste and availability. Also, only slightly more than half (57%) feel they have enough information to understand which foods provide an added benefit.

"The bottom line is that the solution to overcoming these barriers will have to be tailored to the individual and for each functional component. We can further motivate people by creating greater awareness about the functional foods that they may already be consuming, whether it's whole grain cereal for breakfast or yogurt as a snack. Let people know what they are doing well, and then work within a framework to identify their next step on their path toward better health,” says Rahavi.

Most consumers (78%) agree that functional foods can make a meaningful impact on their health when they consume them, and knowing that these foods are good for their health is a good reason (76%) for consumers to eat them more often.

"We still have a big mountain to climb in terms of changing consumers' purchasing behaviors. Providing practical and positive messages that connect taste with health will go a long way in helping consumers move toward better health,” adds Rahavi.

Please feel free to share your thoughts here or on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/#!/meltbutteryspread.

-Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods

Quest for the Perfect Pie Crust

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

For many decades I was comfortable with the illusion that my mother’s pie crust is indeed the very best in the land. My almost religious belief in this universal truth was shattered recently when my blackberry pie was pitted against Meg’s mother’s cherry pie. I am still firm in the belief that my pie-filling was better than hers (personal preference for blackberries). However, I was forced to expand my universe to include other people’s pie crust as equal, nay better, than my mother’s secret recipe. What was the critical difference between the two? They were both thin, flaky crusts made with Melt® instead of butter (my husband can’t even taste the difference between pie crust made with Melt® vs. butter); both crusts complemented the pie filling in a way that only homemade pie crust can do.  The critical differences lay in the finishing touches. While my mother has had a rather Spartan aesthetic with her pie crust allowing the superior texture to stand on its own, Meg’s pie crust was lightly brushed with egg white and sprinkled with sugar to make it sparkly. Damn her sense of aesthetics! 

Cygnia's Thin, Flaky Pie Crust (9-10” Double Crust)

2 c all-purpose flour
1/2 tsp salt
2/3 c Melt®
1/4 -1/3 c ice cold water with 1 tbsp of cider vinegar (to make the crust roll out more consistently)

Sift flour and salt into mixing bowl.

Using pastry cutter to blend Melt into flour.

Add ice cold water with vinegar and mix with hands to create dough.

Add water if too dry, add flour if sticky.

Create dough ball, wrap snugly with cellophane and place in refrigerator for ~60 minutes.

Cut dough ball in half, roll out (with tons of flour on countertop and on rolling pin) to 3/16" to 1/8” thickness (but no thinner).

Gently fold crust in half, draping the fold over the middle of pie dish; unfold crust and center it.

Add filling (e.g., apples, blackberries, raspberries).

Roll out other half, fold in half, drape over pie dish, unfold, center.

Cut away extra pie crust with knife, pinch crust together, cut slits into top pie crust layer and place in oven (usually 450 degrees F for 10 minutes, then 350 degrees F for ~35 minutes).

Tip: lightly brush top pie crust with egg white and sprinkle with raw sugar to make it fancy.

Please feel free to share your thoughts here or on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/#!/meltbutteryspread.

-Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods

 

USDA Farm Subsidies: Eliminate or Reform for Small- to Medium-Size, Local Organic Farms?

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

For all of the bloviating over the Federal deficit and government spending, I would be interested in a healthy public debate on farm subsidies, especially when considering the vast majority of produce subsidized by the USDA ends up in junk food and factory farming.

What if organic produce, dairy, poultry, and beef grown by local small- and medium-size farms were as cheap by the pound as Big Macs, soft drinks, and Kraft Mac n Cheese? Mark Bittman of the NYT has repeatedly called for farm subsidy reform rather than its elimination in the hopes that the government will make it easier for Americans to afford healthy food: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/dont-end-agricultural-subsidies-fix-them/.

The report, “Apples to Twinkies: Comparing Federal Subsidies of Fresh Produce and Junk Food” by CALPIRG and the U.S. PIRG Education Fund, studies the interesting question of whether the nation's problem with obesity is fueled by farm subsidies (for the executive summary, see: http://www.calpirg.org/home/reports/report-archives/health-care/health-care/apples-to-twinkies2). According to the study, the federal government spent $17 billion of the total $260 billion spent subsidizing agriculture on just four common food additives: corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, corn starch, and soy oils. By comparison, the government spent only $261 million subsidizing apples, and far less supporting fruits and vegetables, like spinach, broccoli, and blueberries – which are reported to encourage better health. Corn and soy subsidies account for a whopping 40% (over $100 billion) of all agricultural produce subsidies. Consider these commodity crops are used to support livestock and poultry in factory farming (think “Food, Inc.”). (More reasons for Melt® to be organic, non-GMO, and soy-free!)

The Environmental Working Group has put together an interesting primer on farm subsidies, with fine-grained data on their allocation and the link is included here for your reference: (http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000&progcode=total). It is interesting to note that 10 percent of all farmers collected 74 percent of all subsidies, amounting to $165.9 billion over 16 years.

To put things in perspective, the PIRG study states that if the government had given taxpayers the subsidies instead of the farmers, each taxpayer would have been given $7.36 to spend on junk food and just 11 cents to spend on apples per year. This does not include taxpayer dollars used to subsidize corn and soy used for factory farming and by extension the fast food, beef, and poultry industries, which is probably a far larger number. This is a key factor that makes junk food cheaper than healthy food, which contributes to greater obesity rates in the United States.

Please feel free to share your thoughts here or on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/#!/meltbutteryspread.

-Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods

 

“Food, Inc”: Vote with Your Checkbook and Revolutionize the Food Industry

Monday, September 12th, 2011

I justified taking three years to finally watch “Food, Inc” – a well produced documentary on the meat, poultry, soy, and corn industries – because I changed how I sourced meat in my diet years ago, eating only organic, grass-fed meat. I wish I could call out the 4-5 companies this movie highlights, but I risk legal action because of some odd pro-industry laws that do not protect individuals. You would think I am protected by my right to free speech, but remember when Oprah was sued for sharing her views on hamburgers? If you have not seen this movie, I highly recommend it as it is quite an eye-opener.

Ultimately, “Food, Inc” is not about the disturbing dominance of GMO soy and corn, poorly raised and abused animals in unimaginable conditions, and unacceptable slaughtering and processing environments. “Food, Inc” at its core is about a lack of respect – possibly contempt – these companies have for the animals, the planet, the farmers, the workers who process the meat, and the consumers who eat this “food”. When you buy organic products like Melt®, made with EcoSocial and Fair Trade ingredients, organic meat and poultry, and or locally grown food, you are voting for respect, which translates into health and wellness. By the way, I am quite pleased to announce Melt® is now soy-free!

There was a time when I believed the highest road for combating the unethical and unhealthy beef and poultry industries was to become vegetarian. In fact, I was vegetarian for 7 years, long enough to find the smell of cooking meat to be revolting. Not only did vegetarianism not work for me nutritionally, as it turns out, I was also supporting the very companies I did not want to support through the purchase of food products containing non-organic soy and corn (and its derivatives).  I wasn’t just losing a source of protein, iron, minerals, and vitamin B-12, I was replacing meat with nutritionally inferior foods, specifically soy-based foods.  I was amazed at how much better I felt – almost immediately – when I began eating meat again (organic, grass-fed meat only) and practically eliminating the consumption of soy from my diet.

I respect that some feel vegetarianism and veganism are important political and economic statements against the industrialized beef and poultry sectors. However, I would argue that vegetarianism and veganism are choices that may only opt out of the discussion and are potentially very unhealthy. Purchasing sustainably and humanely raised and processed beef and chicken is far more efficient in changing a broken industry by creating demand; on the other hand, excluding meat and animal products from one's diet is potentially passive and ineffective for initiating measurable change. I welcome you to share your views.

Please feel free to share your thoughts here or on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/#!/meltbutteryspread.

-Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods

 

For the Love of Baking

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

The topic of baking sticks has not always put a bee in my bonnet. Did you know that every butter substitute baking stick in the grocery store has partially hydrogenated oils? Look and see for yourself – even brands like I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter, who have removed partially hydrogenated oils from their table spread/ tub version, still have them in their baking stick products. Why do I care? Consumption of hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated oils (a synthetic, “lab fat”) have been linked to numerous, preventable diseases like obesity, heart disease, diabetes type II, digestive disorders, ADHD in children, and so on. Ingestion of small amounts of partially hydrogenated oils matter: according to Hu et al. (N. Eng. J. Med. 1997, 337:1491-1499), for each 1% increase in fat intake, trans fats (i.e., hydrogenated and partially hydrogenated oils) increase the risk of coronary heart disease approximately 46% versus only 3% for equivalent amount of saturated fat. When the front of any food package says “No Trans Fats”, yet lists partially hydrogenated oils in the ingredient deck, it is because the FDA allows a “No Trans Fat” statement when there is less than 0.5g per serving of trans fat (i.e., industry “loophole”). Baking sticks… who knew?!

What are we doing about it? It is my personal and company’s mission to offer meaningful choices to consumers that are truly enjoyable with the added bonus of excellent nutrition, especially where none exist. For better or worse, this could not be more the case when it comes to the margarine and butter substitute category (zzzzzz… ). I recently completed and submitted our first federal grant proposal via the Small Business Innovative Research program to fund the development of a butter alternative baking stick, based on our awesome, organic Melt® formulation. The key to developing a non-butter baking stick is formulating it to be resistant to oxidation, while continuing to provide the high level of nutrition we value so deeply with our products. Oils like soy, canola, and safflower (oils high in polyunsaturated fat) are highly prone to oxidation in high heat, and therefore inappropriate for frying, baking, and sautéing (I hope this isn’t the first time you have heard this). Oxidized oils undergo numerous, complex changes at the molecular level and their consumption has been linked to very serious diseases, much like hydrogenated oils (www.mercola.com has great information on this topic if you are interested in more details). Our goal is to develop an organic baking stick that is stable for one-time baking and sauté uses without using “lab fats” or synthetic preservatives (e.g., TBHQ), while continuing to deliver on great taste and improvement of overall health.

Please feel free to share your thoughts here or on our facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/#!/meltbutteryspread.

– Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods

Living the Dream

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

Hi! It is hard for me to believe it has been already 5 years since I cashed in my retirement savings to start the Melt® business, working three jobs and figuring out the food industry on the side. I had no prior experience in the food industry (or business!), with my education and professional experience in fluvial geomorphology (sub-discipline of geology in river processes). My husband and I packed everything to move from Seattle, WA to Hailey, ID with a dream of a better life. I feel very lucky to live in the Rocky Mountains of Idaho, mountain biking and skiing as much as time allows. Have you ever thought of starting a business? If so, I can understand your trepidation: startup takes an abundance of courage, tenacity, and willingness to grow on a personal level. While the learning curve seems at times infinite, here are a few tips I have learned along the way:  

It is critically important to use challenges and obstacles as opportunities for finding better solutions and outcomes. This pulls your attention and energy in the most productive direction and if you don’t, then you miss out on better solutions and outcomes.

It takes a village to build a business; take a moment to express your gratitude and appreciation for your village.

If your product is an authentic expression of who you are and solves a genuine need in an innovative way, that grounding will see you through the nay-sayers. If the product truly works for you by solving a problem that is unaddressed in the marketplace, then it probably works for a lot of people.

Coachability is critical for attracting the mentors and connections you need to move forward.

How much money do you need to raise? Triple that number and you may be closer to reality.

Your management team is the most important part of your business – with an outstanding team, any problem or challenge is potentially overcome. Without it you will eventually fail.

The book I wish I read before starting this business: “Eating the Big Fish” by Adam Morgan.

Please feel free to share your thoughts either here or on our facebook page

–Cygnia, Founder of Prosperity Organic Foods